↓ Skip to main content

GSK3 and Alzheimer’s Disease: Facts and Fiction…

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
GSK3 and Alzheimer’s Disease: Facts and Fiction…
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2011.00017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Kremer, Justin V. Louis, Tomasz Jaworski, Fred Van Leuven

Abstract

The physiological functions and pathological roles of the Glycogen synthase kinase-type 3 (GSK3) kinases in peripheral and central systems are diverse and complex, and therefore hard to unravel in molecular detail in vivo. Our assignment to review and discuss available data to clarify the actual position of these kinases in the pathology of Alzheimer's dementia (AD) was both ambitious and easy. On the one hand, numerous studies are available in isolated, recombinant, or cell-based systems, which have resulted in very diverse data-sets that are hardly informative for the brain in vivo. At the other extreme, reliable, and relevant models for the role of GSK3 in CNS are rare, if not lacking. Moreover, (too) many in vivo studies used Li(+) as "specific" inhibitor of GSK3, which is factually not valid because lithium ions are neither specific nor potent inhibitors of GSK3 in vivo. More specific pharmacological inhibitors of GSK3 have met with considerable problems, and are reviewed by others in this issue or elsewhere. We concentrate here on AD-related aspects of GSK3 in brain in vivo, mainly studied in transgenic mice and highlight some of the more important issues, among many remaining: activation of GSK3 by amyloid, phosphorylation of protein tau, effects on or interference with synaptic activity, differentiation between both GSK3 isoforms. These relate directly to brain function, and brain dysfunction in AD, and are to be resolved if we want to understand the molecular pathology of this dreadful disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
India 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 204 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 23%
Researcher 37 17%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 32 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 26%
Neuroscience 34 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 8%
Chemistry 16 7%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 33 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2014.
All research outputs
#17,306,517
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2,155
of 3,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,820
of 190,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#13
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.