↓ Skip to main content

A Gene Network Perspective on Axonal Regeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Gene Network Perspective on Axonal Regeneration
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2011.00046
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ronald E. van Kesteren, Matthew R. J. Mason, Harold D. MacGillavry, August B. Smit, Joost Verhaagen

Abstract

The regenerative capacity of injured neurons in the central nervous system is limited due to the absence of a robust neuron-intrinsic injury-induced gene response that supports axon regeneration. In peripheral neurons axotomy induces a large cohort of regeneration-associated genes (RAGs). The forced expression of some of these RAGs in injured neurons has some beneficial effect on axon regeneration, but the reported effects are rather small. Transcription factors (TFs) provide a promising class of RAGs. TFs are hubs in the regeneration-associated gene network, and potentially control the coordinate expression of many RAGs simultaneously. Here we discuss the use of combined experimental and computational methods to identify novel regeneration-associated TFs with a key role in initiating and maintaining the RAG-response in injured neurons. We propose that a relatively small number of hub TFs with multiple functional connections in the RAG network might provide attractive new targets for gene-based and/or pharmacological approaches to promote axon regeneration in the central nervous system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 87 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 27%
Researcher 21 23%
Student > Bachelor 16 17%
Student > Master 10 11%
Professor 6 6%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 46%
Neuroscience 17 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 9 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2012.
All research outputs
#14,605,487
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#1,617
of 2,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,073
of 180,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#10
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.