↓ Skip to main content

Three functional facets of calbindin D-28k

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Three functional facets of calbindin D-28k
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2012.00025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hartmut Schmidt

Abstract

Many neurons of the vertebrate central nervous system (CNS) express the Ca(2+) binding protein calbindin D-28k (CB), including important projection neurons like cerebellar Purkinje cells but also neocortical interneurons. CB has moderate cytoplasmic mobility and comprises at least four EF-hands that function in Ca(2+) binding with rapid to intermediate kinetics and affinity. Classically it was viewed as a pure Ca(2+) buffer important for neuronal survival. This view was extended by showing that CB is a critical determinant in the control of synaptic Ca(2+) dynamics, presumably with strong impact on plasticity and information processing. Already 30 years ago, in vitro studies suggested that CB could have an additional Ca(2+) sensor function, like its prominent acquaintance calmodulin (CaM). More recent work substantiated this hypothesis, revealing direct CB interactions with several target proteins. Different from a classical sensor, however, CB appears to interact with its targets both, in its Ca(2+)-loaded and Ca(2+)-free forms. Finally, CB has been shown to be involved in buffered transport of Ca(2+), in neurons but also in kidney. Thus, CB serves a threefold function as buffer, transporter and likely as a non-canonical sensor.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 120 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 32%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 33 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 26 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2012.
All research outputs
#20,165,369
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2,436
of 2,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,176
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#37
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.