↓ Skip to main content

Genetically encoded proton sensors reveal activity-dependent pH changes in neurons

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetically encoded proton sensors reveal activity-dependent pH changes in neurons
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2012.00068
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph V. Raimondo, Agnese Irkle, Winnie Wefelmeyer, Sarah E. Newey, Colin J. Akerman

Abstract

The regulation of hydrogen ion concentration (pH) is fundamental to cell viability, metabolism, and enzymatic function. Within the nervous system, the control of pH is also involved in diverse and dynamic processes including development, synaptic transmission, and the control of network excitability. As pH affects neuronal activity, and can also itself be altered by neuronal activity, the existence of tools to accurately measure hydrogen ion fluctuations is important for understanding the role pH plays under physiological and pathological conditions. Outside of their use as a marker of synaptic release, genetically encoded pH sensors have not been utilized to study hydrogen ion fluxes associated with network activity. By combining whole-cell patch clamp with simultaneous two-photon or confocal imaging, we quantified the amplitude and time course of neuronal, intracellular, acidic transients evoked by epileptiform activity in two separate in vitro models of temporal lobe epilepsy. In doing so, we demonstrate the suitability of three genetically encoded pH sensors: deGFP4, E(2)GFP, and Cl-sensor for investigating activity-dependent pH changes at the level of single neurons.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 93 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 25%
Researcher 22 22%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 38%
Neuroscience 24 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Physics and Astronomy 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 14 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2012.
All research outputs
#15,249,959
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#1,814
of 2,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,175
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#24
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.