↓ Skip to main content

The interplay of early-life stress, nutrition, and immune activation programs adult hippocampal structure and function

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The interplay of early-life stress, nutrition, and immune activation programs adult hippocampal structure and function
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2014.00103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lianne Hoeijmakers, Paul J Lucassen, Aniko Korosi

Abstract

Early-life adversity increases the vulnerability to develop psychopathologies and cognitive decline later in life. This association is supported by clinical and preclinical studies. Remarkably, experiences of stress during this sensitive period, in the form of abuse or neglect but also early malnutrition or an early immune challenge elicit very similar long-term effects on brain structure and function. During early-life, both exogenous factors like nutrition and maternal care, as well as endogenous modulators, including stress hormones and mediator of immunological activity affect brain development. The interplay of these key elements and their underlying molecular mechanisms are not fully understood. We discuss here the hypothesis that exposure to early-life adversity (specifically stress, under/malnutrition and infection) leads to life-long alterations in hippocampal-related cognitive functions, at least partly via changes in hippocampal neurogenesis. We further discuss how these different key elements of the early-life environment interact and affect one another and suggest that it is a synergistic action of these elements that shapes cognition throughout life. Finally, we consider different intervention studies aiming to prevent these early-life adversity induced consequences. The emerging evidence for the intriguing interplay of stress, nutrition, and immune activity in the early-life programming calls for a more in depth understanding of the interaction of these elements and the underlying mechanisms. This knowledge will help to develop intervention strategies that will converge on a more complete set of changes induced by early-life adversity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 243 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 19%
Student > Bachelor 40 16%
Student > Master 39 16%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 44 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 26%
Neuroscience 55 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 12%
Psychology 23 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 49 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2023.
All research outputs
#14,032,874
of 24,804,602 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#1,275
of 3,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,660
of 362,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,804,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.