↓ Skip to main content

Structural and Functional Consequences of Connexin 36 (Cx36) Interaction with Calmodulin

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structural and Functional Consequences of Connexin 36 (Cx36) Interaction with Calmodulin
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, November 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2016.00120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan C. F. Siu, Ekaterina Smirnova, Cherie A. Brown, Christiane Zoidl, David C. Spray, Logan W. Donaldson, Georg Zoidl

Abstract

Functional plasticity of neuronal gap junctions involves the interaction of the neuronal connexin36 with calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII). The important relationship between Cx36 and CaMKII must also be considered in the context of another protein partner, Ca(2+) loaded calmodulin, binding an overlapping site in the carboxy-terminus of Cx36. We demonstrate that CaM and CaMKII binding to Cx36 is calcium-dependent, with Cx36 able to engage with CaM outside of the gap junction plaque. Furthermore, Ca(2+) loaded calmodulin activates Cx36 channels, which is different to other connexins. The NMR solution structure demonstrates that CaM binds Cx36 in its characteristic compact state with major hydrophobic contributions arising from W277 at anchor position 1 and V284 at position 8 of Cx36. Our results establish Cx36 as a hub binding Ca(2+) loaded CaM and they identify this interaction as a critical step with implications for functions preceding the initiation of CaMKII mediated plasticity at electrical synapses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Professor 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 33%
Neuroscience 7 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 9 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2017.
All research outputs
#5,604,615
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#747
of 2,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,674
of 415,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#21
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.