↓ Skip to main content

Molecular Mechanisms for the Coupling of Endocytosis to Exocytosis in Neurons

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular Mechanisms for the Coupling of Endocytosis to Exocytosis in Neurons
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, March 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00047
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhenli Xie, Jiangang Long, Jiankang Liu, Zuying Chai, Xinjiang Kang, Changhe Wang

Abstract

Neuronal communication and brain function mainly depend on the fundamental biological events of neurotransmission, including the exocytosis of presynaptic vesicles (SVs) for neurotransmitter release and the subsequent endocytosis for SV retrieval. Neurotransmitters are released through the Ca(2+)- and SNARE-dependent fusion of SVs with the presynaptic plasma membrane. Following exocytosis, endocytosis occurs immediately to retrieve SV membrane and fusion machinery for local recycling and thus maintain the homeostasis of synaptic structure and sustained neurotransmission. Apart from the general endocytic machinery, recent studies have also revealed the involvement of SNARE proteins (synaptobrevin, SNAP25 and syntaxin), synaptophysin, Ca(2+)/calmodulin, and members of the synaptotagmin protein family (Syt1, Syt4, Syt7 and Syt11) in the balance and tight coupling of exo-endocytosis in neurons. Here, we provide an overview of recent progress in understanding how these neuron-specific adaptors coordinate to ensure precise and efficient endocytosis during neurotransmission.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 101 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 29%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 30%
Neuroscience 22 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 18%
Chemistry 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2017.
All research outputs
#18,538,272
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2,281
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,664
of 308,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#88
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.