↓ Skip to main content

Physiological Functions of the β-Site Amyloid Precursor Protein Cleaving Enzyme 1 and 2

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiological Functions of the β-Site Amyloid Precursor Protein Cleaving Enzyme 1 and 2
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, April 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00097
Pubmed ID
Authors

Riqiang Yan

Abstract

BACE1 was discovered as the β-secretase for initiating the cleavage of amyloid precursor protein (APP) at the β-secretase site, while its close homology BACE2 cleaves APP within the β-amyloid (Aβ) domain region and shows distinct cleavage preferences in vivo. Inhibition of BACE1 proteolytic activity has been confirmed to decrease Aβ generation and amyloid deposition, and thus specific inhibition of BACE1 by small molecules is a current focus for Alzheimer's disease therapy. While BACE1 inhibitors are being tested in advanced clinical trials, knowledge regarding the properties and physiological functions of BACE is highly important and this review summarizes advancements in BACE1 research over the past several years. We and others have shown that BACE1 is not only a critical enzyme for testing the "Amyloid Hypothesis" associated with Alzheimer's pathogenesis, but also important for various functions such as axon growth and pathfinding, astrogenesis, neurogenesis, hyperexcitation, and synaptic plasticity. BACE2 appears to play different roles such as glucose homeostasis and pigmentation. This knowledge regarding BACE1 functions is critical for monitoring the safe use of BACE1 inhibitors in humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 19%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 34 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 18%
Neuroscience 21 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 38 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2017.
All research outputs
#3,124,372
of 24,157,645 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#425
of 3,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,216
of 314,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#24
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,157,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.