↓ Skip to main content

Protein S Negatively Regulates Neural Stem Cell Self-Renewal through Bmi-1 Signaling

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protein S Negatively Regulates Neural Stem Cell Self-Renewal through Bmi-1 Signaling
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katya Zelentsova-Levytskyi, Ziv Talmi, Ghada Abboud-Jarrous, Tal Capucha, Tamar Sapir, Tal Burstyn-Cohen

Abstract

Revealing the molecular mechanisms underlying neural stem cell self-renewal is a major goal toward understanding adult brain homeostasis. The self-renewing potential of neural stem and progenitor cells (NSPCs) must be tightly regulated to maintain brain homeostasis. We recently reported the expression of Protein S (PROS1) in adult hippocampal NSPCs, and revealed its role in regulation of NSPC quiescence and neuronal differentiation. Here, we investigate the effect of PROS1 on NSPC self-renewal and show that genetic ablation of Pros1 in neural progenitors increased NSPC self-renewal by 50%. Mechanistically, we identified the upregulation of the polycomb complex protein Bmi-1 and repression of its downstream effectors p16(Ink4a) and p19(Arf) to promote NSPC self-renewal in Pros1-ablated cells. Rescuing Pros1 expression restores normal levels of Bmi-1 signaling, and reverts the proliferation and enhanced self-renewal phenotypes observed in Pros1-deleted cells. Our study identifies PROS1 as a novel negative regulator of NSPC self-renewal. We conclude PROS1 is instructive for NSPC differentiation by negatively regulating Bmi-1 signaling in adult and embryonic neural stem cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 18%
Unspecified 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Unspecified 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Neuroscience 2 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,420,242
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2,486
of 2,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,474
of 310,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#104
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.