↓ Skip to main content

Lost in Translation: Defects in Transfer RNA Modifications and Neurological Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lost in Translation: Defects in Transfer RNA Modifications and Neurological Disorders
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, May 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Bednářová, Marley Hanna, Isabella Durham, Tara VanCleave, Alexis England, Anathbandhu Chaudhuri, Natraj Krishnan

Abstract

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are key molecules participating in protein synthesis. To augment their functionality they undergo extensive post-transcriptional modifications and, as such, are subject to regulation at multiple levels including transcription, transcript processing, localization and ribonucleoside base modification. Post-transcriptional enzyme-catalyzed modification of tRNA occurs at a number of base and sugar positions and influences specific anticodon-codon interactions and regulates translation, its efficiency and fidelity. This phenomenon of nucleoside modification is most remarkable and results in a rich structural diversity of tRNA of which over 100 modified nucleosides have been characterized. Most often these hypermodified nucleosides are found in the wobble position of tRNAs, where they play a direct role in codon recognition as well as in maintaining translational efficiency and fidelity, etc. Several recent studies have pointed to a link between defects in tRNA modifications and human diseases including neurological disorders. Therefore, defects in tRNA modifications in humans need intensive characterization at the enzymatic and mechanistic level in order to pave the way to understand how lack of such modifications are associated with neurological disorders with the ultimate goal of gaining insights into therapeutic interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Researcher 23 17%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 30 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 18%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Unspecified 6 4%
Chemistry 4 3%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 36 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,420,242
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2,486
of 2,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,473
of 310,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#106
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.