↓ Skip to main content

Autophagy Dysregulation in ALS: When Protein Aggregates Get Out of Hand

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Autophagy Dysregulation in ALS: When Protein Aggregates Get Out of Hand
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, August 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00263
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nandini Ramesh, Udai Bhan Pandey

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disorder that results from the loss of upper and lower motor neurons. One of the key pathological hallmarks in diseased neurons is the mislocalization of disease-associated proteins and the formation of cytoplasmic aggregates of these proteins and their interactors due to defective protein quality control. This apparent imbalance in the cellular protein homeostasis could be a crucial factor in causing motor neuron death in the later stages of the disease in patients. Autophagy is a major protein degradation pathway that is involved in the clearance of protein aggregates and damaged organelles. Abnormalities in autophagy have been observed in numerous neurodegenerative disorders, including ALS. In this review, we discuss the contribution of autophagy dysfunction in various in vitro and in vivo models of ALS. Furthermore, we examine the crosstalk between autophagy and other cellular stresses implicated in ALS pathogenesis and the therapeutic implications of regulating autophagy in ALS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 299 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 23%
Student > Bachelor 40 13%
Researcher 38 13%
Student > Master 38 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 69 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 76 25%
Neuroscience 53 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Other 26 9%
Unknown 73 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2017.
All research outputs
#4,509,651
of 25,016,456 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#694
of 3,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,813
of 322,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#10
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,016,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.