↓ Skip to main content

MeCP2 Deficiency in Neuroglia: New Progress in the Pathogenesis of Rett Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MeCP2 Deficiency in Neuroglia: New Progress in the Pathogenesis of Rett Syndrome
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, October 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00316
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xu-Rui Jin, Xing-Shu Chen, Lan Xiao

Abstract

Rett syndrome (RTT) is an X-linked neurodevelopmental disease predominantly caused by mutations of the methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2) gene. Generally, RTT has been attributed to neuron-centric dysfunction. However, increasing evidence has shown that glial abnormalities are also involved in the pathogenesis of RTT. Mice that are MeCP2-null specifically in glial cells showed similar behavioral and/or neuronal abnormalities as those found in MeCP2-null mice, a mouse model of RTT. MeCP2 deficiency in astrocytes impacts the expression of glial intermediate filament proteins such as fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and S100 and induces neuron toxicity by disturbing glutamate metabolism or enhancing microtubule instability. MeCP2 deficiency in oligodendrocytes (OLs) results in down-regulation of myelin gene expression and impacts myelination. While MeCP2-deficient microglia cells fail in response to environmental stimuli, release excessive glutamate, and aggravate impairment of the neuronal circuit. In this review, we mainly focus on the progress in determining the role of MeCP2 in glial cells involved in RTT, which may provide further insight into a therapeutic intervention for RTT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Student > Bachelor 23 18%
Student > Master 20 15%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 30 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 36 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 35 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2017.
All research outputs
#20,449,496
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2,493
of 2,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,876
of 323,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#104
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.