↓ Skip to main content

Differential Roles of Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 Subtypes Alpha and Beta in Cortical Development

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential Roles of Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 Subtypes Alpha and Beta in Cortical Development
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, November 2017
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00391
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan-xia Ma, Xiu-li Wang, Jian-quan Chen, Bin Li, Eun-Mi Hur, Saijilafu

Abstract

Glycogen synthase kinases 3 (GSK3) α and β are expressed in the nervous system, and disruption of GSK3 signaling has been implicated in a wide range of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders. Although several studies have established a role of GSK3 signaling in the nervous system, much less is known about isoform-specific functions. Here, we have examined the role of GSK3α and GSK3β in the developing neocortex by performing in utero electroporation with specific small interfering RNAs targeting each isoform. We found that depletion of either GSK3α or GSK3β commonly promoted the proliferation of neural progenitor cells in the ventricular zone, but at later stages, knocking down of each isoform resulted in distinct outcomes. In particular, the transformation of radial progenitors to intermediate progenitor cells was promoted in GSK3α-depleted cells, but markedly prevented in GSK3β-depleted cells. Moreover, knocking down of GSK3β but not GSK3α prevented the generation of upper-layer Cux1+ neurons. Consistent with the distinct outcomes, protein levels of c-Myc and β-catenin, well-known substrates of GSK3, were differentially affected by depletion of GSK3α and GSK3β. Together, these results suggest that GSK3α and GSK3β might play distinct roles in the genesis and differentiation of neuronal lineage cells during neocortex development by differential regulation of downstream signaling pathways.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Neuroscience 5 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2017.
All research outputs
#17,922,331
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2,074
of 2,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,000
of 438,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#76
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.