↓ Skip to main content

Distinct Mechanisms of Pathogenic DJ-1 Mutations in Mitochondrial Quality Control

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distinct Mechanisms of Pathogenic DJ-1 Mutations in Mitochondrial Quality Control
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, March 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00068
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela Strobbe, Alexis A. Robinson, Kirsten Harvey, Lara Rossi, Caterina Ferraina, Valerio de Biase, Carlo Rodolfo, Robert J. Harvey, Michelangelo Campanella

Abstract

The deglycase and chaperone protein DJ-1 is pivotal for cellular oxidative stress responses and mitochondrial quality control. Mutations inPARK7, encoding DJ-1, are associated with early-onset familial Parkinson's disease and lead to pathological oxidative stress and/or disrupted protein degradation by the proteasome. The aim of this study was to gain insights into the pathogenic mechanisms of selected DJ-1 missense mutations, by characterizing protein-protein interactions, core parameters of mitochondrial function, quality control regulation via autophagy, and cellular death following dopamine accumulation. We report that the DJ-1M26Imutant influences DJ-1 interactions with SUMO-1, in turn enhancing removal of mitochondria and conferring increased cellular susceptibility to dopamine toxicity. By contrast, the DJ-1D149Amutant does not influence mitophagy, but instead impairs Ca2+dynamics and free radical homeostasis by disrupting DJ-1 interactions with a mitochondrial accessory protein known as DJ-1-binding protein (DJBP/EFCAB6). Thus, individual DJ-1 mutations have different effects on mitochondrial function and quality control, implying mutation-specific pathomechanisms converging on impaired mitochondrial homeostasis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Student > Master 11 17%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 30%
Neuroscience 11 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 21 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2018.
All research outputs
#14,096,200
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#1,439
of 2,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,089
of 333,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#59
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.