↓ Skip to main content

Autoimmune Neurological Conditions Associated With Zika Virus Infection

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Autoimmune Neurological Conditions Associated With Zika Virus Infection
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, April 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yeny Acosta-Ampudia, Diana M. Monsalve, Luis F. Castillo-Medina, Yhojan Rodríguez, Yovana Pacheco, Susan Halstead, Hugh J. Willison, Juan-Manuel Anaya, Carolina Ramírez-Santana

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) is an emerging flavivirus rapidly spreading throughout the tropical Americas. Aedes mosquitoes is the principal way of transmission of the virus to humans. ZIKV can be spread by transplacental, perinatal, and body fluids. ZIKV infection is often asymptomatic and those with symptoms present minor illness after 3 to 12 days of incubation, characterized by a mild and self-limiting disease with low-grade fever, conjunctivitis, widespread pruritic maculopapular rash, arthralgia and myalgia. ZIKV has been linked to a number of central and peripheral nervous system injuries such as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), transverse myelitis (TM), meningoencephalitis, ophthalmological manifestations, and other neurological complications. Nevertheless, mechanisms of host-pathogen neuro-immune interactions remain incompletely elucidated. This review provides a critical discussion about the possible mechanisms underlying the development of autoimmune neurological conditions associated with Zika virus infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 132 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 21%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 39 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 10%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 43 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2018.
All research outputs
#13,509,734
of 23,028,364 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#1,295
of 2,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,786
of 329,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#50
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,028,364 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.