↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Activity-Dependent DNA Demethylation in the Adult Brain and in Neurological Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
13 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role of Activity-Dependent DNA Demethylation in the Adult Brain and in Neurological Disorders
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, May 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00169
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gonca Bayraktar, Michael R. Kreutz

Abstract

Over the last decade, an increasing number of reports underscored the importance of epigenetic regulations in brain plasticity. Epigenetic elements such as readers, writers and erasers recognize, establish, and remove the epigenetic tags in nucleosomes, respectively. One such regulation concerns DNA-methylation and demethylation, which are highly dynamic and activity-dependent processes even in the adult neurons. It is nowadays widely believed that external stimuli control the methylation marks on the DNA and that such processes serve transcriptional regulation in neurons. In this mini-review, we cover the current knowledge on the regulatory mechanisms controlling in particular DNA demethylation as well as the possible functional consequences in health and disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 26 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 17%
Neuroscience 12 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 27 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,362,019
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#696
of 3,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,509
of 344,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#22
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.