↓ Skip to main content

Key Genes and Pathways Associated With Inner Ear Malformation in SOX10 p.R109W Mutation Pigs

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Key Genes and Pathways Associated With Inner Ear Malformation in SOX10 p.R109W Mutation Pigs
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00181
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qing-Qing Hao, Liang Li, Wei Chen, Qing-Qing Jiang, Fei Ji, Wei Sun, Hong Wei, Wei-Wei Guo, Shi-Ming Yang

Abstract

SRY-box 10 (SOX10) mutation may lead to inner ear deformities. However, its molecular mechanisms on inner ear development are not clear. In this work, the inner ear morphology was investigated at different embryonic stages of the SOX10 mutation miniature porcine model with sensorineural hearing loss, and high-throughput RNA-seq and bioinformatics analyses were applied. Our results indicated that the SOX10 mutation in the miniature pigs led to an incomplete partition (IP) of the cochlea, a cystic apex caused by fusion from middle and apical turns, cochlear modiolar defects and a shortened cochlear duct. The model demonstrated 173 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and 185 differentially expressed long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs). The down-regulated DEGs most significantly enriched the inflammatory mediator regulation of the TRP channels, arachidonic acid metabolism, and the salivary secretion pathways, while the up-regulated DEGs most significantly enriched the systemic lupus erythematosus and alcoholism pathways. Based on gene cluster analysis, we selected four gene groups: WNT1, KCNQ4, STRC and PAX6.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 18%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2018.
All research outputs
#18,639,173
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2,300
of 2,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,906
of 329,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#92
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.