↓ Skip to main content

Deletion of Kncn Does Not Affect Kinocilium and Stereocilia Bundle Morphogenesis and Mechanotransduction in Cochlear Hair Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deletion of Kncn Does Not Affect Kinocilium and Stereocilia Bundle Morphogenesis and Mechanotransduction in Cochlear Hair Cells
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, September 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00326
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qun Hu, Li Guo, Jie Li, Chenmeng Song, Lisheng Yu, David Z. Z. He, Wei Xiong

Abstract

Auditory hair cells possess stunning cilia structure that composes of a bundle of stereocilia for mechano-electrical transduction and a single kinocilium for guiding the polarity of hair bundle towards maturation. However, the molecules underlying kinocilium function have not yet been fully understood. Hence, the proteins involved in hair bundle development and function are of a large interest. From a fine microarray analysis, we found that kinocilin (Kncn) was enriched in hair cell specific expression profile. Consistently, it has been reported that KNCN was a protein mainly located in the kinocilium of hair cells in the inner ear. However, the hypothesis that KNCN is a kinocilium protein has not been validated in mice with Kncn gene perturbed. In this study, we generated Kncn knockout mouse lines by CRISPR/Cas9 technique and further examined the morphology and function of cochlear hair cells. Our results showed that there was no obvious hearing loss in the knockout mice, determined by audiometry. Histological study demonstrated that the inner ear and hair cell structure were intact. Especially, there was no deficit of mechanotransduction (MET) in cochlear outer hair cells (OHCs). In summary, our work suggests that KNCN is not essential for kinocilium-oriented hair bundle function in cochlear hair cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Neuroscience 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2018.
All research outputs
#17,990,409
of 23,103,903 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2,087
of 2,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,141
of 337,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#97
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,903 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.