↓ Skip to main content

Role of Long Noncoding RNAs and Circular RNAs in Nerve Regeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of Long Noncoding RNAs and Circular RNAs in Nerve Regeneration
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, June 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00165
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chun Yao, Bin Yu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 17%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 26%
Neuroscience 6 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 14 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2019.
All research outputs
#15,176,208
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#1,722
of 2,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,215
of 351,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#49
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.