↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED: Different Amyloid-β Self-Assemblies Have Distinct Effects on Intracellular Tau Aggregation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RETRACTED: Different Amyloid-β Self-Assemblies Have Distinct Effects on Intracellular Tau Aggregation
Published in
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, November 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00268
Pubmed ID
Authors

Woo Shik Shin, Jing Di, Kevin A. Murray, Chuanqi Sun, Binsen Li, Gal Bitan, Lin Jiang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 17 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 12 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 20 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,780,599
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#295
of 3,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,978
of 382,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#14
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.