You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Corrigendum: Alleviation of cognitive deficits in a rat model of glutamate-induced excitotoxicity, using an N-type voltage-gated calcium channel ligand, extracted from Agelena labyrinthica crude venom
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience, March 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnmol.2023.1180964 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mohammad Keimasi, Kowsar Salehifard, Mohammadjavad Keimasi, Mohammadreza Amirsadri, Noushin Mirshah Jafar Esfahani, Majid Moradmand, Fariba Esmaeili, Mohammad Reza Mofid |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#19,956,779
of 24,527,858 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#2,522
of 3,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,708
of 411,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
#86
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,527,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.