↓ Skip to main content

A History of Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 442)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
340 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
824 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A History of Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity
Published in
Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnsyn.2011.00004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Henry Markram, Wulfram Gerstner, Per Jesper Sjöström

Abstract

How learning and memory is achieved in the brain is a central question in neuroscience. Key to today's research into information storage in the brain is the concept of synaptic plasticity, a notion that has been heavily influenced by Hebb's (1949) postulate. Hebb conjectured that repeatedly and persistently co-active cells should increase connective strength among populations of interconnected neurons as a means of storing a memory trace, also known as an engram. Hebb certainly was not the first to make such a conjecture, as we show in this history. Nevertheless, literally thousands of studies into the classical frequency-dependent paradigm of cellular learning rules were directly inspired by the Hebbian postulate. But in more recent years, a novel concept in cellular learning has emerged, where temporal order instead of frequency is emphasized. This new learning paradigm - known as spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) - has rapidly gained tremendous interest, perhaps because of its combination of elegant simplicity, biological plausibility, and computational power. But what are the roots of today's STDP concept? Here, we discuss several centuries of diverse thinking, beginning with philosophers such as Aristotle, Locke, and Ribot, traversing, e.g., Lugaro's plasticità and Rosenblatt's perceptron, and culminating with the discovery of STDP. We highlight interactions between theoretical and experimental fields, showing how discoveries sometimes occurred in parallel, seemingly without much knowledge of the other field, and sometimes via concrete back-and-forth communication. We point out where the future directions may lie, which includes interneuron STDP, the functional impact of STDP, its mechanisms and its neuromodulatory regulation, and the linking of STDP to the developmental formation and continuous plasticity of neuronal networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 824 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 24 3%
United Kingdom 10 1%
Germany 9 1%
Nigeria 9 1%
Switzerland 6 <1%
Netherlands 6 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Other 18 2%
Unknown 731 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 203 25%
Researcher 133 16%
Student > Master 104 13%
Student > Bachelor 97 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 42 5%
Other 146 18%
Unknown 99 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 187 23%
Neuroscience 155 19%
Engineering 81 10%
Computer Science 62 8%
Physics and Astronomy 45 5%
Other 174 21%
Unknown 120 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,049,068
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
#9
of 442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,062
of 192,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them