↓ Skip to main content

Paying attention to smell: cholinergic signaling in the olfactory bulb

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Paying attention to smell: cholinergic signaling in the olfactory bulb
Published in
Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnsyn.2014.00021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rinaldo D. D’Souza, Sukumar Vijayaraghavan

Abstract

The tractable, layered architecture of the olfactory bulb (OB), and its function as a relay between odor input and higher cortical processing, makes it an attractive model to study how sensory information is processed at a synaptic and circuit level. The OB is also the recipient of strong neuromodulatory inputs, chief among them being the central cholinergic system. Cholinergic axons from the basal forebrain modulate the activity of various cells and synapses within the OB, particularly the numerous dendrodendritic synapses, resulting in highly variable responses of OB neurons to odor input that is dependent upon the behavioral state of the animal. Behavioral, electrophysiological, anatomical, and computational studies examining the function of muscarinic and nicotinic cholinergic receptors expressed in the OB have provided valuable insights into the role of acetylcholine (ACh) in regulating its function. We here review various studies examining the modulation of OB function by cholinergic fibers and their target receptors, and provide putative models describing the role that cholinergic receptor activation might play in the encoding of odor information.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 100 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 21%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Master 16 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 31%
Neuroscience 24 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 21 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2021.
All research outputs
#13,181,283
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
#193
of 408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,152
of 252,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.