↓ Skip to main content

Distinct synaptic and neurochemical changes to the granule cell-CA3 projection in Bassoon mutant mice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distinct synaptic and neurochemical changes to the granule cell-CA3 projection in Bassoon mutant mice
Published in
Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnsyn.2015.00018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Dieni, Sigrun Nestel, Mirjam Sibbe, Michael Frotscher, Sabine Hellwig

Abstract

Proper synaptic function depends on a finely-tuned balance between events such as protein synthesis and structural organization. In particular, the functional loss of just one synaptic-related protein can have a profound impact on overall neuronal network function. To this end, we used a mutant mouse model harboring a mutated form of the presynaptic scaffolding protein Bassoon (Bsn), which is phenotypically characterized by: (i) spontaneous generalized epileptic seizure activity, representing a chronically-imbalanced neuronal network; and (ii) a dramatic increase in hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) protein concentration, a key player in synaptic plasticity. Detailed morphological and neurochemical analyses revealed that the increased BDNF levels are associated with: (i) modified neuropeptide distribution; (ii) perturbed expression of selected markers of synaptic activation or plasticity; (iii) subtle changes to microglial structure; and (iv) morphological alterations to the mossy fiber (MF) synapse. These findings emphasize the important contribution of Bassoon protein to normal hippocampal function, and further characterize the Bsn-mutant as a useful model for studying the effects of chronic changes to network activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 38%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 9 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2015.
All research outputs
#18,429,163
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
#329
of 412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,158
of 283,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.