↓ Skip to main content

Presynaptic Molecular Determinants of Quantal Size

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
11 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Presynaptic Molecular Determinants of Quantal Size
Published in
Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnsyn.2016.00002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shigeo Takamori

Abstract

The quantal hypothesis for the release of neurotransmitters at the chemical synapse has gained wide acceptance since it was first worked out at the motor endplate in frog skeletal muscle in the 1950's. Considering the morphological identification of synaptic vesicles (SVs) at the nerve terminals that appeared to be homogeneous in size, the hypothesis proposed that signal transduction at synapses is mediated by the release of neurotransmitters packed in SVs that are individually uniform in size; the amount of transmitter in a synaptic vesicle is called a quantum. Although quantal size-the amplitude of the postsynaptic response elicited by the release of neurotransmitters from a single vesicle-clearly depends on the number and sensitivity of the postsynaptic receptors, accumulating evidence has also indicated that the amount of neurotransmitters stored in SVs can be altered by various presynaptic factors. Here, I provide an overview of the concepts and underlying presynaptic molecular underpinnings that may regulate quantal size.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 88 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 24%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 18 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 33 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 20 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#6,098,677
of 24,513,158 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
#108
of 438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,765
of 408,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,513,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.