↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of cardiac function in rat endovascular perforation model of subarachnoid hemorrhage; A model of subarachnoid hemorrhage-induced cardiac dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessment of cardiac function in rat endovascular perforation model of subarachnoid hemorrhage; A model of subarachnoid hemorrhage-induced cardiac dysfunction
Published in
Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience, August 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnsyn.2022.919998
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masahito Munakata, Hideaki Kanazawa, Kensuke Kimura, Takahide Arai, Hiroaki Sukegawa, Keiichi Fukuda

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2022.
All research outputs
#20,574,182
of 23,151,189 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
#369
of 416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#343,508
of 433,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience
#16
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.