↓ Skip to main content

Different Corticostriatal Integration in Spiny Projection Neurons from Direct and Indirect Pathways

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Different Corticostriatal Integration in Spiny Projection Neurons from Direct and Indirect Pathways
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edén Flores-Barrera, Bianca J. Vizcarra-Chacón, Dagoberto Tapia, José Bargas, Elvira Galarraga

Abstract

The striatum is the principal input structure of the basal ganglia. Major glutamatergic afferents to the striatum come from the cerebral cortex and make monosynaptic contacts with medium spiny projection neurons (MSNs) and interneurons. Also: glutamatergic afferents to the striatum come from the thalamus. Despite differences in axonal projections, dopamine (DA) receptors expression and differences in excitability between MSNs from "direct" and "indirect" basal ganglia pathways, these neuronal classes have been thought as electrophysiologically very similar. Based on work with bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) transgenic mice, here it is shown that corticostriatal responses in D(1)- and D(2)-receptor expressing MSNs (D(1)- and D(2)-MSNs) are radically different so as to establish an electrophysiological footprint that readily differentiates between them. Experiments in BAC mice allowed us to predict, with high probability (P > 0.9), in rats or non-BAC mice, whether a recorded neuron, from rat or mouse, was going to be substance P or enkephalin (ENK) immunoreactive. Responses are more prolonged and evoke more action potentials in D(1)-MSNs, while they are briefer and exhibit intrinsic autoregenerative responses in D(2)-MSNs. A main cause for these differences was the interaction of intrinsic properties with the inhibitory contribution in each response. Inhibition always depressed corticostriatal depolarization in D(2)-MSNs, while it helped in sustaining prolonged depolarizations in D(1)-MSNs, in spite of depressing early discharge. Corticostriatal responses changed dramatically after striatal DA depletion in 6-hydroxy-dopamine (6-OHDA) lesioned animals: a response reduction was seen in substance P (SP)+ MSNs whereas an enhanced response was seen in ENK+ MSNs. The end result was that differences in the responses were greatly diminished after DA depletion.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 112 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 26%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 12%
Professor 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 5 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 40%
Neuroscience 36 30%
Psychology 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 8 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2010.
All research outputs
#20,143,522
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#1,220
of 1,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,497
of 163,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#19
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.