You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical Applications of Resting State Functional Connectivity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael D. Fox, Michael Greicius |
| Abstract |
During resting conditions the brain remains functionally and metabolically active. One manifestation of this activity that has become an important research tool is spontaneous fluctuations in the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The identification of correlation patterns in these spontaneous fluctuations has been termed resting state functional connectivity (fcMRI) and has the potential to greatly increase the translation of fMRI into clinical care. In this article we review the advantages of the resting state signal for clinical applications including detailed discussion of signal to noise considerations. We include guidelines for performing resting state research on clinical populations, outline the different areas for clinical application, and identify important barriers to be addressed to facilitate the translation of resting state fcMRI into the clinical realm. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | <1% |
| Italy | 8 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 7 | <1% |
| Germany | 6 | <1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 24 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1273 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 302 | 22% |
| Researcher | 275 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 177 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 102 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 86 | 6% |
| Other | 246 | 18% |
| Unknown | 179 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 263 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 258 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 211 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 108 | 8% |
| Engineering | 106 | 8% |
| Other | 139 | 10% |
| Unknown | 282 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,990,104
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#173
of 1,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,684
of 166,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.