↓ Skip to main content

Typical and Atypical Development of Functional Human Brain Networks: Insights from Resting-State fMRI

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
310 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
576 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Typical and Atypical Development of Functional Human Brain Networks: Insights from Resting-State fMRI
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucina Q. Uddin, Kaustubh Supekar, Vinod Menon

Abstract

Over the past several decades, structural MRI studies have provided remarkable insights into human brain development by revealing the trajectory of gray and white matter maturation from childhood to adolescence and adulthood. In parallel, functional MRI studies have demonstrated changes in brain activation patterns accompanying cognitive development. Despite these advances, studying the maturation of functional brain networks underlying brain development continues to present unique scientific and methodological challenges. Resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI) has emerged as a novel method for investigating the development of large-scale functional brain networks in infants and young children. We review existing rsfMRI developmental studies and discuss how this method has begun to make significant contributions to our understanding of maturing brain organization. In particular, rsfMRI has been used to complement studies in other modalities investigating the emergence of functional segregation and integration across short and long-range connections spanning the entire brain. We show that rsfMRI studies help to clarify and reveal important principles of functional brain development, including a shift from diffuse to focal activation patterns, and simultaneous pruning of local connectivity and strengthening of long-range connectivity with age. The insights gained from these studies also shed light on potentially disrupted functional networks underlying atypical cognitive development associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. We conclude by identifying critical gaps in the current literature, discussing methodological issues, and suggesting avenues for future research.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 576 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 3%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Netherlands 6 1%
Canada 4 <1%
China 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 527 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 148 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 135 23%
Student > Master 60 10%
Student > Bachelor 49 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 41 7%
Other 95 16%
Unknown 48 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 179 31%
Neuroscience 95 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 82 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 9%
Engineering 27 5%
Other 58 10%
Unknown 83 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2010.
All research outputs
#20,143,522
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#1,220
of 1,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,497
of 163,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#19
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.