You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring the Electrophysiological Correlates of the Default-Mode Network with Intracerebral EEG
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00027 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karim Jerbi, Juan R. Vidal, Tomas Ossandon, Sarang S. Dalal, Julien Jung, Dominique Hoffmann, Lorella Minotti, Olivier Bertrand, Philippe Kahane, Jean-Philippe Lachaux |
| Abstract |
While functional imaging studies allow for a precise spatial characterization of resting state networks, their neural correlates and thereby their fine-scale temporal dynamics remain elusive. A full understanding of the mechanisms at play requires input from electrophysiological studies. Here, we discuss human and non-human primate electrophysiological data that explore the neural correlates of the default-mode network. Beyond the promising findings obtained with non-invasive approaches, emerging evidence suggests that invasive recordings in humans will be crucial in order to elucidate the neural correlates of the brain's default-mode function. In particular, we contend that stereotactic-electroencephalography, which consists of implanting multiple depth electrodes for pre-surgical evaluation in drug-resistant epilepsy, is particularly suited for this endeavor. We support this view by providing rare data from depth recordings in human posterior cingulate cortex and medial prefrontal cortex that show transient neural deactivation during task-engagement. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 303 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 81 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 12% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 70 | 21% |
| Unknown | 29 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 74 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 66 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 12% |
| Engineering | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 11% |
| Unknown | 52 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2014.
All research outputs
#13,879,517
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#710
of 1,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,285
of 170,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#13
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.