↓ Skip to main content

Rewiring Neural Interactions by Micro-Stimulation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rewiring Neural Interactions by Micro-Stimulation
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, August 2010
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00039
Pubmed ID
Authors

James M. Rebesco, Ian H. Stevenson, Konrad P. Körding, Sara A. Solla, Lee E. Miller

Abstract

Plasticity is a crucial component of normal brain function and a critical mechanism for recovery from injury. In vitro, associative pairing of presynaptic spiking and stimulus-induced postsynaptic depolarization causes changes in the synaptic efficacy of the presynaptic neuron, when activated by extrinsic stimulation. In vivo, such paradigms can alter the responses of whole groups of neurons to stimulation. Here, we used in vivo spike-triggered stimulation to drive plastic changes in rat forelimb sensorimotor cortex, which we monitored using a statistical measure of functional connectivity inferred from the spiking statistics of the neurons during normal, spontaneous behavior. These induced plastic changes in inferred functional connectivity depended on the latency between trigger spike and stimulation, and appear to reflect a robust reorganization of the network. Such targeted connectivity changes might provide a tool for rerouting the flow of information through a network, with implications for both rehabilitation and brain-machine interface applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 5%
Germany 4 2%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 170 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 31%
Researcher 48 26%
Professor 12 6%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 5%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 20 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 46 24%
Neuroscience 41 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 9%
Physics and Astronomy 6 3%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 21 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2020.
All research outputs
#12,852,228
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#680
of 1,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,962
of 94,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them