↓ Skip to main content

Lateral Spread of Orientation Selectivity in V1 is Controlled by Intracortical Cooperativity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lateral Spread of Orientation Selectivity in V1 is Controlled by Intracortical Cooperativity
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, February 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2011.00004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frédéric Chavane, Dahlia Sharon, Dirk Jancke, Olivier Marre, Yves Frégnac, Amiram Grinvald

Abstract

Neurons in the primary visual cortex receive subliminal information originating from the periphery of their receptive fields (RF) through a variety of cortical connections. In the cat primary visual cortex, long-range horizontal axons have been reported to preferentially bind to distant columns of similar orientation preferences, whereas feedback connections from higher visual areas provide a more diverse functional input. To understand the role of these lateral interactions, it is crucial to characterize their effective functional connectivity and tuning properties. However, the overall functional impact of cortical lateral connections, whatever their anatomical origin, is unknown since it has never been directly characterized. Using direct measurements of postsynaptic integration in cat areas 17 and 18, we performed multi-scale assessments of the functional impact of visually driven lateral networks. Voltage-sensitive dye imaging showed that local oriented stimuli evoke an orientation-selective activity that remains confined to the cortical feedforward imprint of the stimulus. Beyond a distance of one hypercolumn, the lateral spread of cortical activity gradually lost its orientation preference approximated as an exponential with a space constant of about 1 mm. Intracellular recordings showed that this loss of orientation selectivity arises from the diversity of converging synaptic input patterns originating from outside the classical RF. In contrast, when the stimulus size was increased, we observed orientation-selective spread of activation beyond the feedforward imprint. We conclude that stimulus-induced cooperativity enhances the long-range orientation-selective spread.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Canada 4 3%
Italy 3 2%
Germany 3 2%
Japan 2 1%
Belarus 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 114 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 29%
Student > Master 12 9%
Professor 7 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 5%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 13 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 37%
Neuroscience 25 19%
Psychology 13 10%
Computer Science 7 5%
Linguistics 6 4%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 16 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2014.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#1,017
of 1,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,008
of 119,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them