You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Chaotic Desynchronization as the Therapeutic Mechanism of Deep Brain Stimulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2011.00050 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles J. Wilson, Bryce Beverlin, Theoden Netoff |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 5 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 30% |
| Researcher | 29 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Professor | 11 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 25 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 15% |
| Engineering | 17 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2011.
All research outputs
#15,675,797
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#967
of 1,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,574
of 182,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#24
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.