↓ Skip to main content

Reduced Pallidal Output Causes Dystonia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reduced Pallidal Output Causes Dystonia
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2011.00089
Pubmed ID
Authors

Atsushi Nambu, Satomi Chiken, Pullanipally Shashidharan, Hiroki Nishibayashi, Mitsuhiro Ogura, Koji Kakishita, Satoshi Tanaka, Yoshihisa Tachibana, Hitoshi Kita, Toru Itakura

Abstract

Dystonia is a neurological disorder characterized by sustained or repetitive involuntary muscle contractions and abnormal postures. In the present article, we will introduce our recent electrophysiological studies in hyperkinetic transgenic mice generated as a model of DYT1 dystonia and in a human cervical dystonia patient, and discuss the pathophysiology of dystonia on the basis of these electrophysiological findings. Recording of neuronal activity in the awake state of DYT1 dystonia model mice revealed reduced spontaneous activity with bursts and pauses in both internal (GPi) and external (GPe) segments of the globus pallidus. Electrical stimulation of the primary motor cortex evoked responses composed of excitation and subsequent long-lasting inhibition, the latter of which was never observed in normal mice. In addition, somatotopic arrangements were disorganized in the GPi and GPe of dystonia model mice. In a human cervical dystonia patient, electrical stimulation of the primary motor cortex evoked similar long-lasting inhibition in the GPi and GPe. Thus, reduced GPi output may cause increased thalamic and cortical activity, resulting in the involuntary movements observed in dystonia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Netherlands 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 43 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 13 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Engineering 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 12 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2022.
All research outputs
#18,919,226
of 23,443,716 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#1,139
of 1,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,029
of 183,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#32
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,443,716 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.