↓ Skip to main content

Connectivity Concordance Mapping: A New Tool for Model-Free Analysis of fMRI Data of the Human Brain

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Connectivity Concordance Mapping: A New Tool for Model-Free Analysis of fMRI Data of the Human Brain
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2012.00013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriele Lohmann, Smadar Ovadia-Caro, Gerhard Jan Jungehülsing, Daniel S. Margulies, Arno Villringer, Robert Turner

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance data acquired in a task-absent condition ("resting state") require new data analysis techniques that do not depend on an activation model. Here, we propose a new analysis method called Connectivity Concordance Mapping (CCM). The main idea is to assign a label to each voxel based on the reproducibility of its whole-brain pattern of connectivity. Specifically, we compute the correlations of time courses of each voxel with every other voxel for each measurement. Voxels whose correlation pattern is consistent across measurements receive high values. The result of a CCM analysis is thus a voxel-wise map of concordance values. Regions of high inter-subject concordance can be assumed to be functionally consistent, and may thus be of specific interest for further analysis. Here we present two fMRI studies to demonstrate the possible applications of the algorithm. The first is a eyes-open/eyes-closed paradigm designed to highlight the potential of the method in a relatively simple domain. The second study is a longitudinal repeated measurement of a patient following stroke. Longitudinal clinical studies such as this may represent the most interesting domain of applications for this algorithm.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 105 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 25%
Professor 12 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 6 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 19%
Neuroscience 16 14%
Computer Science 10 9%
Engineering 9 8%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 11 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2012.
All research outputs
#13,366,719
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#750
of 1,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,660
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#23
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.