↓ Skip to main content

MR connectomics: a conceptual framework for studying the developing brain

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MR connectomics: a conceptual framework for studying the developing brain
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2012.00043
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patric Hagmann, Patricia E. Grant, Damien A. Fair

Abstract

THE COMBINATION OF ADVANCED NEUROIMAGING TECHNIQUES AND MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS IN COMPLEX NETWORK SCIENCE, HAVE GIVEN BIRTH TO A NEW FRAMEWORK FOR STUDYING THE BRAIN: "connectomics." This framework provides the ability to describe and study the brain as a dynamic network and to explore how the coordination and integration of information processing may occur. In recent years this framework has been used to investigate the developing brain and has shed light on many dynamic changes occurring from infancy through adulthood. The aim of this article is to review this work and to discuss what we have learned from it. We will also use this body of work to highlight key technical aspects that are necessary in general for successful connectome analysis using today's advanced neuroimaging techniques. We look to identify current limitations of such approaches, what can be improved, and how these points generalize to other topics in connectome research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Spain 5 3%
Germany 2 1%
Netherlands 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Israel 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 161 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 25%
Student > Master 15 8%
Professor 11 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 5%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 22 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 18%
Psychology 32 17%
Neuroscience 31 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 9%
Engineering 12 7%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 38 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2012.
All research outputs
#3,087,045
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#308
of 1,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,697
of 244,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#7
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.