↓ Skip to main content

Functional roles of the thalamus for language capacities

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional roles of the thalamus for language capacities
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00032
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabian Klostermann, Lea K. Krugel, Felicitas Ehlen

Abstract

Early biological concepts of language were predominantly corticocentric, but over the last decades biolinguistic research, equipped with new technical possibilities, has drastically changed this view. To date, connectionist models, conceiving linguistic skills as corticobasal network activities, dominate our understanding of the neural basis of language. However, beyond the notion of an involvement of the thalamus and, in most cases also, the basal ganglia (BG) in linguistic operations, specific functions of the respective depth structures mostly remain rather controversial. In this review, some of these issues shall be discussed, particularly the functional configuration of basal network components and the language specificity of subcortical supporting activity. Arguments will be provided for a primarily cortico-thalamic language network. In this view, the thalamus does not engage in proper linguistic operations, but rather acts as a central monitor for language-specific cortical activities, supported by the BG in both perceptual and productive language execution.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 109 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 26 22%
Psychology 21 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 9%
Linguistics 5 4%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 27 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,186,789
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#357
of 1,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,529
of 290,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#22
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.