↓ Skip to main content

Rhythmic cognition in humans and animals: distinguishing meter and pulse perception

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
15 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
137 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rhythmic cognition in humans and animals: distinguishing meter and pulse perception
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00068
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. Tecumseh Fitch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 245 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 21%
Student > Master 48 19%
Researcher 42 16%
Student > Bachelor 25 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 7%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 31 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 62 24%
Neuroscience 38 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 12%
Arts and Humanities 22 9%
Linguistics 21 8%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 42 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,234,211
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#91
of 1,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,241
of 292,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#11
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.