↓ Skip to main content

The mechanisms for pattern completion and pattern separation in the hippocampus

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
368 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
700 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The mechanisms for pattern completion and pattern separation in the hippocampus
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00074
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edmund T. Rolls

Abstract

The mechanisms for pattern completion and pattern separation are described in the context of a theory of hippocampal function in which the hippocampal CA3 system operates as a single attractor or autoassociation network to enable rapid, one-trial, associations between any spatial location (place in rodents, or spatial view in primates) and an object or reward, and to provide for completion of the whole memory during recall from any part. The factors important in the pattern completion in CA3 together with a large number of independent memories stored in CA3 include a sparse distributed representation which is enhanced by the graded firing rates of CA3 neurons, representations that are independent due to the randomizing effect of the mossy fibers, heterosynaptic long-term depression as well as long-term potentiation in the recurrent collateral synapses, and diluted connectivity to minimize the number of multiple synapses between any pair of CA3 neurons which otherwise distort the basins of attraction. Recall of information from CA3 is implemented by the entorhinal cortex perforant path synapses to CA3 cells, which in acting as a pattern associator allow some pattern generalization. Pattern separation is performed in the dentate granule cells using competitive learning to convert grid-like entorhinal cortex firing to place-like fields. Pattern separation in CA3, which is important for completion of any one of the stored patterns from a fragment, is provided for by the randomizing effect of the mossy fiber synapses to which neurogenesis may contribute, by the large number of dentate granule cells each with a sparse representation, and by the sparse independent representations in CA3. Recall to the neocortex is achieved by a reverse hierarchical series of pattern association networks implemented by the hippocampo-cortical backprojections, each one of which performs some pattern generalization, to retrieve a complete pattern of cortical firing in higher-order cortical areas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 700 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 673 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 166 24%
Student > Master 118 17%
Researcher 104 15%
Student > Bachelor 81 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 6%
Other 79 11%
Unknown 111 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 201 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 144 21%
Psychology 112 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 5%
Computer Science 18 3%
Other 57 8%
Unknown 134 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,036,248
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#178
of 1,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,302
of 284,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#16
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.