↓ Skip to main content

New roles for the cerebellum in health and disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
369 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New roles for the cerebellum in health and disease
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00083
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stacey L. Reeber, Tom S. Otis, Roy V. Sillitoe

Abstract

The cerebellum has a well-established role in maintaining motor coordination and studies of cerebellar learning suggest that it does this by recognizing neural patterns, which it uses to predict optimal movements. Serious damage to the cerebellum impairs this learning and results in a set of motor disturbances called ataxia. However, recent work implicates the cerebellum in cognition and emotion, and it has been argued that cerebellar dysfunction contributes to non-motor conditions such as autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Based on human and animal model studies, two major questions arise. Does the cerebellum contribute to non-motor as well as motor diseases, and if so, how does altering its function contribute to such diverse symptoms? The architecture and connectivity of cerebellar circuits may hold the answers to these questions. An emerging view is that cerebellar defects can trigger motor and non-motor neurological conditions by globally influencing brain function. Furthermore, during development cerebellar circuits may play a role in wiring events necessary for higher cognitive functions such as social behavior and language. We discuss genetic, electrophysiological, and behavioral evidence that implicates Purkinje cell dysfunction as a major culprit in several diseases and offer a hypothesis as to how canonical cerebellar functions might be at fault in non-motor as well as motor diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 369 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 347 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 20%
Researcher 57 15%
Student > Bachelor 49 13%
Student > Master 46 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 5%
Other 66 18%
Unknown 56 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 23%
Neuroscience 81 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 11%
Psychology 40 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 5%
Other 31 8%
Unknown 72 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,162,408
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#376
of 1,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,909
of 282,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#24
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.