You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of appetitive and aversive outcomes on brain responses: linking the animal and human literatures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gregory B. Bissonette, Ronny N. Gentry, Srikanth Padmala, Luiz Pessoa, Matthew R. Roesch |
| Abstract |
Decision-making is motivated by the possibility of obtaining reward and/or avoiding punishment. Though many have investigated behavior associated with appetitive or aversive outcomes, few have examined behaviors that rely on both. Fewer still have addressed questions related to how anticipated appetitive and aversive outcomes interact to alter neural signals related to expected value, motivation, and salience. Here we review recent rodent, monkey, and human research that address these issues. Further development of this area will be fundamental to understanding the etiology behind human psychiatric diseases and cultivating more effective treatments. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Canada | 2 | 22% |
| Palestine, State of | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Italy | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 30% |
| Researcher | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 21% |
| Unknown | 16 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 41 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 26 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 22 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,746,546
of 25,022,483 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#506
of 1,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,058
of 227,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,022,483 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.