↓ Skip to main content

Empirical evidence for musical syntax processing? Computer simulations reveal the contribution of auditory short-term memory

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Empirical evidence for musical syntax processing? Computer simulations reveal the contribution of auditory short-term memory
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00094
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emmanuel Bigand, Charles Delbé, Bénédicte Poulin-Charronnat, Marc Leman, Barbara Tillmann

Abstract

During the last decade, it has been argued that (1) music processing involves syntactic representations similar to those observed in language, and (2) that music and language share similar syntactic-like processes and neural resources. This claim is important for understanding the origin of music and language abilities and, furthermore, it has clinical implications. The Western musical system, however, is rooted in psychoacoustic properties of sound, and this is not the case for linguistic syntax. Accordingly, musical syntax processing could be parsimoniously understood as an emergent property of auditory memory rather than a property of abstract processing similar to linguistic processing. To support this view, we simulated numerous empirical studies that investigated the processing of harmonic structures, using a model based on the accumulation of sensory information in auditory memory. The simulations revealed that most of the musical syntax manipulations used with behavioral and neurophysiological methods as well as with developmental and cross-cultural approaches can be accounted for by the auditory memory model. This led us to question whether current research on musical syntax can really be compared with linguistic processing. Our simulation also raises methodological and theoretical challenges to study musical syntax while disentangling the confounded low-level sensory influences. In order to investigate syntactic abilities in music comparable to language, research should preferentially use musical material with structures that circumvent the tonal effect exerted by psychoacoustic properties of sounds.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Finland 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 80 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 33%
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Professor 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 27%
Arts and Humanities 13 15%
Neuroscience 11 13%
Computer Science 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 18 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2016.
All research outputs
#15,302,068
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#958
of 1,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,585
of 228,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#40
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.