↓ Skip to main content

Enlarging the scope: grasping brain complexity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
29 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enlarging the scope: grasping brain complexity
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00122
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emmanuelle Tognoli, J. A. Scott Kelso

Abstract

To further advance our understanding of the brain, new concepts and theories are needed. In particular, the ability of the brain to create information flows must be reconciled with its propensity for synchronization and mass action. The theoretical and empirical framework of Coordination Dynamics, a key aspect of which is metastability, are presented as a starting point to study the interplay of integrative and segregative tendencies that are expressed in space and time during the normal course of brain and behavioral function. Some recent shifts in perspective are emphasized, that may ultimately lead to a better understanding of brain complexity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Belarus 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 120 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 22%
Professor 11 8%
Student > Master 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 9 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 24 18%
Psychology 22 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 15%
Computer Science 15 11%
Physics and Astronomy 9 7%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 18 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,073,730
of 25,045,181 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#82
of 1,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,391
of 233,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#9
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,045,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.