↓ Skip to main content

Best of both worlds: promise of combining brain stimulation and brain connectome

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Best of both worlds: promise of combining brain stimulation and brain connectome
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00132
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline Di Bernardi Luft, Ernesto Pereda, Michael J. Banissy, Joydeep Bhattacharya

Abstract

Transcranial current brain stimulation (tCS) is becoming increasingly popular as a non-pharmacological non-invasive neuromodulatory method that alters cortical excitability by applying weak electrical currents to the scalp via a pair of electrodes. Most applications of this technique have focused on enhancing motor and learning skills, as well as a therapeutic agent in neurological and psychiatric disorders. In these applications, similarly to lesion studies, tCS was used to provide a causal link between a function or behavior and a specific brain region (e.g., primary motor cortex). Nonetheless, complex cognitive functions are known to rely on functionally connected multitude of brain regions with dynamically changing patterns of information flow rather than on isolated areas, which are most commonly targeted in typical tCS experiments. In this review article, we argue in favor of combining tCS method with other neuroimaging techniques (e.g., fMRI, EEG) and by employing state-of-the-art connectivity data analysis techniques (e.g., graph theory) to obtain a deeper understanding of the underlying spatiotemporal dynamics of functional connectivity patterns and cognitive performance. Finally, we discuss the possibilities of using these combined techniques to investigate the neural correlates of human creativity and to enhance creativity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 213 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 20%
Student > Master 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 9%
Other 43 19%
Unknown 24 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 56 25%
Neuroscience 44 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 12%
Engineering 20 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 43 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2014.
All research outputs
#2,872,070
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#251
of 1,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,618
of 233,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#14
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.