↓ Skip to main content

Circadian gating of neuronal functionality: a basis for iterative metaplasticity1

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circadian gating of neuronal functionality: a basis for iterative metaplasticity1
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00164
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rajashekar Iyer, Tongfei A. Wang, Martha U. Gillette

Abstract

Brain plasticity, the ability of the nervous system to encode experience, is a modulatory process leading to long-lasting structural and functional changes. Salient experiences induce plastic changes in neurons of the hippocampus, the basis of memory formation and recall. In the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the central circadian (~24-h) clock, experience with light at night induces changes in neuronal state, leading to circadian plasticity. The SCN's endogenous ~24-h time-generator comprises a dynamic series of functional states, which gate plastic responses. This restricts light-induced alteration in SCN state-dynamics and outputs to the nighttime. Endogenously generated circadian oscillators coordinate the cyclic states of excitability and intracellular signaling molecules that prime SCN receptivity to plasticity signals, generating nightly windows of susceptibility. We propose that this constitutes a paradigm of ~24-h iterative metaplasticity, the repeated, patterned occurrence of susceptibility to induction of neuronal plasticity. We detail effectors permissive for the cyclic susceptibility to plasticity. We consider similarities of intracellular and membrane mechanisms underlying plasticity in SCN circadian plasticity and in hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP). The emerging prominence of the hippocampal circadian clock points to iterative metaplasticity in that tissue as well. Exploring these links holds great promise for understanding circadian shaping of synaptic plasticity, learning, and memory.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Chile 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 77 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 40%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Master 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 33%
Neuroscience 21 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#7,206,321
of 23,505,064 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#570
of 1,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,465
of 251,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#31
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.