↓ Skip to main content

Self-organized criticality as a fundamental property of neural systems

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
358 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
550 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Self-organized criticality as a fundamental property of neural systems
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00166
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janina Hesse, Thilo Gross

Abstract

The neural criticality hypothesis states that the brain may be poised in a critical state at a boundary between different types of dynamics. Theoretical and experimental studies show that critical systems often exhibit optimal computational properties, suggesting the possibility that criticality has been evolutionarily selected as a useful trait for our nervous system. Evidence for criticality has been found in cell cultures, brain slices, and anesthetized animals. Yet, inconsistent results were reported for recordings in awake animals and humans, and current results point to open questions about the exact nature and mechanism of criticality, as well as its functional role. Therefore, the criticality hypothesis has remained a controversial proposition. Here, we provide an account of the mathematical and physical foundations of criticality. In the light of this conceptual framework, we then review and discuss recent experimental studies with the aim of identifying important next steps to be taken and connections to other fields that should be explored.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 550 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 6 1%
United States 6 1%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 519 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 140 25%
Researcher 98 18%
Student > Master 73 13%
Student > Bachelor 42 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 4%
Other 90 16%
Unknown 86 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 106 19%
Physics and Astronomy 91 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 13%
Computer Science 35 6%
Engineering 34 6%
Other 110 20%
Unknown 104 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,292,048
of 25,424,630 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#194
of 1,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,695
of 263,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#14
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,424,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.