You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cognitive biases can affect moral intuitions about cognitive enhancement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00195 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucius Caviola, Adriano Mannino, Julian Savulescu, Nadira Faulmüller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 13% |
| Spain | 3 | 7% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Grenada | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 72% |
| Scientists | 8 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 20% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Philosophy | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 21% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#974,156
of 25,815,269 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#73
of 1,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,403
of 268,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#5
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,815,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.