↓ Skip to main content

Problems with theories that equate consciousness with information or information processing

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
33 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Problems with theories that equate consciousness with information or information processing
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00225
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Pockett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 46 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 24%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Student > Master 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 14 29%
Psychology 8 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Philosophy 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,780,970
of 24,791,202 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#142
of 1,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,350
of 373,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#6
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,791,202 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.