↓ Skip to main content

Optogenetic dissection of medial prefrontal cortex circuitry

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
673 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optogenetic dissection of medial prefrontal cortex circuitry
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, December 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00230
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danai Riga, Mariana R. Matos, Annet Glas, August B. Smit, Sabine Spijker, Michel C. Van den Oever

Abstract

The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is critically involved in numerous cognitive functions, including attention, inhibitory control, habit formation, working memory and long-term memory. Moreover, through its dense interconnectivity with subcortical regions (e.g., thalamus, striatum, amygdala and hippocampus), the mPFC is thought to exert top-down executive control over the processing of aversive and appetitive stimuli. Because the mPFC has been implicated in the processing of a wide range of cognitive and emotional stimuli, it is thought to function as a central hub in the brain circuitry mediating symptoms of psychiatric disorders. New optogenetics technology enables anatomical and functional dissection of mPFC circuitry with unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution. This provides important novel insights in the contribution of specific neuronal subpopulations and their connectivity to mPFC function in health and disease states. In this review, we present the current knowledge obtained with optogenetic methods concerning mPFC function and dysfunction and integrate this with findings from traditional intervention approaches used to investigate the mPFC circuitry in animal models of cognitive processing and psychiatric disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 673 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 651 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 181 27%
Researcher 111 16%
Student > Master 82 12%
Student > Bachelor 68 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 7%
Other 81 12%
Unknown 104 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 238 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 158 23%
Psychology 42 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 3%
Other 53 8%
Unknown 129 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2015.
All research outputs
#2,166,089
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#175
of 1,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,725
of 370,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#3
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.