You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The biological role of the medial olivocochlear efferents in hearing: separating evolved function from exaptation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David W. Smith, Andreas Keil |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 86 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 23% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 21 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,493,633
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#524
of 1,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,555
of 255,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#23
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.